Vulnerabilities multiply faster than teams can patch them — thousands of CVEs per month, dozens of assets per CVE, and no clear priority. The result: critical patches sit in a backlog while attackers exploit known CVEs within days of disclosure.

Without a structured workflow, vulnerability data lives in a scanner PDF nobody reads, patching is handled case-by-case at the service desk, and compliance reports are assembled manually under deadline pressure.

Utilyx models vulnerability management as an executable workflow — CVE scan, asset correlation, CVSS prioritization, patch deployment, verification and audit-ready reporting.

• CVE scan: the workflow runs vulnerability scans on enrolled assets and ingests CVE feeds, mapping each CVE to affected software versions.

• Asset correlation: the AI copilot correlates each CVE against the asset inventory — which installed titles, which versions, which assets are exposed — giving a precise blast radius.

• Risk prioritization: the copilot scores each finding by CVSS, asset criticality and exposure (internet-facing vs internal), producing a prioritized remediation queue.

• Patch deployment workflow: patches are packaged, tested in a pilot group, deployed to affected assets in waves, and tracked to completion — with rollback on failure.

• Verification: post-deployment scans confirm the CVE is remediated; any residual exposure triggers a new remediation cycle.

• PDF compliance report: usePDF generates a vulnerability compliance report — findings, patches, verification — for auditors and regulators, in 7 languages.

• Archiving: useArchive retains every scan, patch record and verification in a tamper-evident audit trail.

Teams deploying Utilyx cut mean-time-to-patch on critical CVEs by 70% (prioritized queue, automated deployment), achieve 100% compliance reporting on demand, and pass security audits without manual assembly.

The no-code designer and AI copilot let a security or IT manager build the vulnerability workflow in one session — no security consultants, at 70% lower TCO than legacy vulnerability management platforms.